Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a 79.2 score against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is an extremely older and a lot thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it noticeably lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher video definition and a camera with lot more MP. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.