Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is much thicker and was released many years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a larger display, a just a bit higher screen pixels density and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with more mega pixels, a much better video resolution and a larger aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.