Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's general score of 77.8. Galaxy S10e's construction is much lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's notably thicker and was released 5 years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a camera with lot more MP, a much higher video quality and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.