Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Galaxy S7 design is extremely lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker and was released 8 years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a much lower pixels density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a lot brighter screen and a way larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way larger sensor and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.