Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2023-05-11 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 1 V is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.7 score against 77.8. Xperia 1 V's construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's extremely thicker and was released about 11 months before. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia 1 V has older 13 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Sony Xperia 1 V, because although it has a lot worse count of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower 2200 x 2480 resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia 1 V, because it has 256 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia 1 V, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little better battery duration than Xperia 1 V, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better camera than Xperia 1 V, because it has a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a much higher video quality, a higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.