Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 77.2. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is way newer and noticeably thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Xperia XZs. The Xperia XZs features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro and the Xperia XZs feature extremely similar cameras, although the Xperia XZs has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, a lot lower (4K) video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and a much tinier sensor shooting much lower quality videos and photographs.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia XZs, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia XZs. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xperia XZs, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.