Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 overall score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is newer and a lot thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a bigger screen, a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a slightly better storage for games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with better battery duration than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because it has a much better video definition, a much larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.