Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 78.1 score against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is incredibly older and thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a lot lighter.
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a little better pixel density, a really bigger display, much more brightness and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures, a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a way better video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.