Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 6's global score of 76.5. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 6, it's much thinner and also incredibly newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, way more brightness and a much bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 6 has a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera with a much higher resolution, a way better video resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.