Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-03 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Max's 77.5 overall score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and extremely thinner device than Xiaomi Mi Max, although it is a little heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a bigger display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a just a little higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Max features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a way better video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.