Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-03 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a global score of 80.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a incredibly older and much thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it a bit lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has way more display brightness, a quite greater pixels amount in each inch of screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a much less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor and a larger aperture to take better low light images and video.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.