Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-03 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.73 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1915.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 414 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a 77.8 score against 77.2. These phones have Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is way newer and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, but it's heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a much brighter display, a bigger screen and a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a lot better video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light environments, a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.