Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. The Google Pixel 2 is an notably older phone than the vivo X50 Pro, but Google made it a little thinner and incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the display.
The vivo X50 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 60% more battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.