Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same thickness than vivo X50 Pro, but it is a little bit lighter. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Vivo X50 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor giving a worse image quality and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Vivo X50 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.