Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.21 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Emerald green and Twilight |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Although Huawei Mate 20 Pro is a better device than the vivo X50 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier device. Huawei Mate 20 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The vivo X50 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Huawei Mate 20 Pro and vivo X50 Pro have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Huawei Mate 20 Pro has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Huawei Mate 20 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, a back-facing camera with less mega pixels and a lower video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Huawei Mate 20 Pro, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.