Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Mystic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2772 x 1334 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 452 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A77 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G78 MP24 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a score of 90.9, which is a lot better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Although the Huawei Mate 40 Pro is better than the vivo X50 Pro, we must note that it is also a thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
Huawei Mate 40 Pro features a bit better processing power than vivo X50 Pro. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a higher resolution of 1334 x 2772 pixels.
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro also counts with faster video frame rates, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and a more megapixels back facing camera.
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro features as much storage capacity to install applications and games as vivo X50 Pro, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. Huawei Mate 40 Pro has just a little better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.