Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 has a score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but LG Q8 has 7.0 Nougat version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and performance tweaks. LG Q8's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, although it was released many years before.
The LG Q8 counts with a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen. The vivo X50 Pro has a bit faster processor than LG Q8, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than LG Q8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro has a better camera than LG Q8, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than LG Q8, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.