Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 80.7 against 75.4. Even though Motorola One Vision is older and just a little thicker than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still just a little lighter. Vivo X50 Pro has just a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520. The Motorola One Vision features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a 48 megapixels camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much bigger sensor.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.