Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A31's design is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than vivo X50 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a display that's just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Vivo X50 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro features more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A31 features superior battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4315mAh.
The vivo X50 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.