Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Galaxy A5 (2017)'s body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than vivo X50 Pro, although it was released 4 years before. The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro and the Galaxy A5 (2017) both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X50 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels back camera.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.