Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a 79.5 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older phone than vivo X50 Pro, but it is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel count per display inch.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity. Vivo X50 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.