Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z5 is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a overall score of 77.6 against 75.4. Even though the Xperia Z5 is a lot older than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Xperia Z5 has the previous 5.1 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with more RAM. The Xperia Z5 has a much better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better camera than Xperia Z5, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.