Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than vivo X50 Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X50 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a way larger sensor.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4315mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.