Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a general score of 83.8 against 75.4. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X50 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit better processing unit than vivo X50 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a screen that's very similar to the vivo X50 Pro one, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density. Vivo X50 Pro has a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as vivo X50 Pro, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.