Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is better than the vivo X50 Pro, we must tell that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the vivo X50 Pro one, both of them have the same internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X50 Pro features improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.