Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than vivo X50 Pro, having a overall score of 84.3 against 75.4. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is somewhat heavier than vivo X50 Pro, it's extremely thinner and incredibly newer. These devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a way higher 2224 x 2488px resolution, a larger screen and a little bit higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better video quality, a more megapixels camera and a lot larger camera sensor. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 and vivo X50 Pro both have very similar memory to install applications and games, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with improved battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.