Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting an 87.9 score against 75.4. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give all the same operating system features. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than vivo X50 Pro, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
Vivo X50 Pro features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.