Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G design is newer than vivo X50 Pro's, but it's a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G and vivo X50 Pro count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro has a little faster processor than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features superior battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a much worse image and video quality, and they both have a back camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.