Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is an a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The vivo X50 Pro features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality, and they both have a camera with a 48 MP resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has longer battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.