Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A42 is better than the vivo X60, having an 87 score against 75.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier phone.
Vivo X60 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A42, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the vivo X60 also has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a greater pixel number in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A42 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A42 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Vivo X60 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A42, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A42 features greater battery life than vivo X60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. Vivo X60 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.