Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than the vivo X60, having a general score of 75.8 against 75.1. Although Galaxy A5 (2017) is much older and just a little bit thicker than vivo X60, it's body is still a bit lighter. Vivo X60 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a bigger display.
The vivo X60 has a bit better performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Vivo X60 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels, a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a much higher video quality. Vivo X60 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 43% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.