Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the vivo X60, having a global score of 79.5 against 75.1. Galaxy S7 is a much older and a little thicker phone than the vivo X60, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo X60 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a better screen than vivo X60, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels density. The vivo X60 has more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X60 features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Vivo X60 has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also counts with faster video frame rates, a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.