Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than vivo X60, having a 75.8 score against 75.1. Galaxy S7 Active's body is noticeably older, a little bit heavier and way thicker than vivo X60. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter display than vivo X60, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X60 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
Vivo X60 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 also counts with higher video frame rates and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.