Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a global score of 84.5 against 78.3. The iPhone XS Max is a way older and somewhat heavier cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but Apple was able to build it a little bit thinner anyway. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
IPhone XS Max has a bit faster processing unit than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography, a camera with much more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.