Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a global score of 81.6 against 78.3. The Google Pixel 2 is a lighter device than vivo X70 Pro, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each inch of screen.
Vivo X70 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a much more mega-pixels back camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.