Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 78.3. Google Pixel XL is a older and just a bit thicker phone than vivo X70 Pro, but Google was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X70 Pro has a quite better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Vivo X70 Pro has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4450mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.