Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. The LG V30 is an extremely older device than the vivo X70 Pro, but LG was able to build it lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Vivo X70 Pro features a little faster CPU than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V30 counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. Vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
LG V30 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro features greater battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 35 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.