Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro, having an 83.7 score against 78.3. LG V50 ThinQ is a notably older and just a little thicker cellphone than vivo X70 Pro, but LG could make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better display pixel density.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.