Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a score of 84.7 against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while vivo X70 Pro comes with Android 11 OS. Even being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A32 is a somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than vivo X70 Pro.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite larger screen. The vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a camera with more MP and a larger camera aperture. Vivo X70 Pro features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.