Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has an overall score of 84.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. The Galaxy A7 (2018) body is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than vivo X70 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a display that's just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X70 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.