Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a overall score of 91.8 against 78.3. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design is older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than vivo X70 Pro. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you all the same OS features.
Galaxy A71 5G has a display that's just as good as the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The vivo X70 Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better camera than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, a tinier back camera sensor providing a worse image quality and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's battery life is just as good as vivo X70 Pro's battery duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.