Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Despite being the best phone in this review, Galaxy A80's construction is extremely older, somewhat heavier and thicker than vivo X70 Pro. Vivo X70 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X70 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.