Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-30 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Despite being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also way older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy M30s features a screen that's very similar to the display in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Vivo X70 Pro features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy M30s features superior battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4450mAh. Vivo X70 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.