Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Although it's the best we compare here, the Galaxy M31 construction is older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X70 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. Vivo X70 Pro has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M31's camera is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, worse video frame rates and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
Vivo X70 Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has better battery lifetime than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.