Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is much better than vivo X70 Pro, having a score of 88 against 78.3. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy M31s is a better cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone.
Galaxy M31s counts with a display that is very similar to the vivo X70 Pro one, because although the Galaxy M31s has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy M31s counts with a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in vivo X70 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy M31s has lower video frame rates, a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos and a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Galaxy M31s has superior battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.