Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than vivo X70 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 78.3. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a way older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the vivo X70 Pro. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater pixels amount per inch in the display.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 has a bit more storage for applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X70 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.