Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-09-30 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, getting a 79.3 score against 78.3. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ design is lighter and thinner than vivo X70 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 Pro has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger aperture, better video frame rates and a camera with way more megapixels.
Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.