Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 79.1 against 78.3. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, it must be told that it's also a much older, a little bit heavier and much thicker cellphone. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xperia XZ2 has a slightly better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density. Vivo X70 Pro counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro has a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 3180mAh. The vivo X70 Pro takes better videos and photos than Xperia XZ2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a way bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.