Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-30 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 16.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 85.5 against 78.3. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a noticeably older and thicker phone than vivo X70 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to build it a little lighter anyway. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.