Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than vivo X70's overall score of 73.8. Even though Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the vivo X70, it must be noted that it is also a much older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Vivo X70 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X70 features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 28% more battery capacity.
The vivo X70 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations and a tinier camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.